购买大麻企业:分步指南
我经常撰写关于大麻并购交易各个具体方面的文章。本文底部提供了我的文章完整列表,以及Canna Law Blog 其他Canna Law Blog 文章链接。今天,我不想再探讨大麻并购交易的单个要素,而是想带大家全面了解这类交易的具体流程
我经常撰写关于大麻并购交易各个具体方面的文章。本文底部提供了我的文章完整列表,以及Canna Law Blog 其他Canna Law Blog 文章链接。今天,我不想再探讨大麻并购交易的单个要素,而是想带大家全面了解这类交易的具体流程
Some readers may be surprised to realize that a lot of cannabis stakeholders actually don’t want broadsweeping federal legalization. Why? Because they know it means that they’ll instantly be competing with well-established companies that are already masters of economies of scale, branding, marketing, and consumer sales, and their market share will shrink or be eliminated
早在2015年,我们就曾报道过美国邮政服务局(USPS)对企业在大麻广告中使用邮寄渠道提出异议。俄勒冈州波特兰地区邮寄要求办公室在2015年11月27日发布的书面通知中阐明:"若邮件内容包含大麻广告,该邮件即属不可邮寄物品"。
如果你在处理大麻业务合同时,有时甚至总是不得不充当起法律顾问的角色,那么这篇文章就是为你准备的。我成长于威斯康星州的乡村,父母都是在经济大萧条时期长大的。我父母有几个孩子,而且
Cannabis licensing has a pretty standard trajectory by this point in time. States tend to start out with medical programs and later adopt recreational programs. What usually happens is that the recreational cannabis market swallows up the medical market. The majority of medical operators will seek out and get authorization to sell recreational cannabis, and
Seen as a protectionist, cottage measure to some stakeholders, residency requirements for cannabis licensure have been a staple in the industry since Washington and Colorado legalized cannabis statewide back in 2012. When I lived in Seattle, the local industry was mostly stoked then that “big money” and out-of-state interests couldn’t easily crash the party that
My last post in this series, which ran a few weeks ago, went over some of the more common representations and warranties you’d see in the average cannabis M&A transaction. In that post, I briefly mentioned disclosure schedules, which are an integral part of a purchase agreement and its reps and warranties. Today, I’ll get
经营大麻业务的方式五花八门,其中不乏许多糟糕的做法,我们自认为几乎都见识过了。但恐怕没有比企业股权五五分更糟糕的模式了——这简直是各种灾难的温床。让我们来看看原因何在,以及如何避免这种情况。
We wrote a couple of times about the Department of Cannabis Control’s (DCC) proposed emergency regulations. See here and here. Under those regulations, some interesting changes were proposed around the definitions of owners and financial interest holders, alongside restrictions on license stacking on “contiguous” premises (among other things). On September 15, 2021, the DCC submitted
Last Friday and Saturday, members of the Oregon Bar gathered (online) for the third annual Cannabis Law Institute (CLI) put on by the Cannabis and Psychedelics Law Section of the Oregon State Bar. Topics included agricultural liens and receiverships, securities in the cannabis industry, federal and state hemp updates, Oregon’s Psilocybin Act, and the failures