大麻商标诉讼：商标是其组成部分的总和
在我们密切关注的一起案件中，加州地区法院法官近日驳回了大麻公司Capna Intellectual的动议。该动议旨在驳回烟草巨头ITG Brands针对其"KOOL"品牌提出的淡化索赔。ITG的品牌标识使用"KOOL OOs"，而Capna的品牌标识使用"BLOOM OOs"。回顾背景：2020年12月，ITG曾——
加利福尼亚州将禁止Delta-8 THC吗？
For a state that pioneered medical cannabis and was a relatively early adopter of recreational cannabis (cannabis is defined only as marijuana here and not hemp), California is among the worst states in the union when it comes to sensible hemp-derived CBD policy. So it should surprise absolutely nobody that in legislation that’s designed to
加州大麻产业仍在经历成长的阵痛。砸钱解决问题无济于事。
Hard to believe that it’s been five years since the passage of Prop. 64, which legalized the distribution and sale of cannabis for adults 21 and up in the State of California. Like all “cannabis friendly” states, California has had issues and time delays getting a licensing framework off the ground. Of course, this is
加州大麻租户装修：七大核心问题
在加利福尼亚州，每一家希望获得大麻经营许可证的企业都必须购买或租赁房产，因为许可证与房产绑定。鉴于获得许可证或企业能否成功存在不确定性，加之有时还面临资金限制，大麻企业通常会选择租赁而非购买。作为许可流程的一部分，州和地方机构
加州悄然禁止CBD化妆品了吗？
若您过去几年持续关注我们的博客，便知加州在工业大麻提取的CBD问题上始终持荒谬立场。尽管该州率先推动大麻合法化（在加州法律中，"大麻"仅指大麻而非工业大麻），但当局始终无法——
大麻行业并购与房地产交易：何为交割？
Virtually any time that there are transactions involving cannabis company mergers, cannabis company acquisitions, or cannabis real estate sales, and in many cases involving the sale of assets of a cannabis company, the parties are likely to encounter a concept called “closing” in their purchase agreements. Closing isn’t necessarily unique to purchase and sale situations
加利福尼亚州大麻供应链合同：费用转移条款
California’s cannabis regime is set up to separate every point in the supply chain into different license types: cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, testing, and retail sales, to name a few. Except for a few vertically integrated companies, virtually all cannabis businesses must rely on other companies in the supply chain to get products from farm to
加州大麻政策变动：大麻管制委员会可能带来哪些新动向？
In January 2020, Governor Newsom announced that he intended to have the Bureau of Cannabis Control (BCC), California Department of Food and Agriculture’s CalCannabis Program (CDFA), and California Department of Public Health’s Manufactured Cannabis Safety Branch (CDPH), consolidated into a single cannabis agency: the Department of Cannabis Control (DCC) (as summarized in the Governor’s 2021
可吸食CBD产品的未来前景不容乐观：第二部分
今年一月，我发表了本文的第一部分，毫不意外地，内容全都在讲述大麻CBD电子烟公司面临的法律困境正日益恶化。此后，情况也如预料般进一步恶化。让我们直接切入正题，看看发生了什么。首先，加利福尼亚州最近提出了一项法案——
加州大麻标签警报：新《第65号提案》要求即将实施
For better or worse, the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (a/k/a Prop. 65) has long plagued California businesses. And cannabis businesses are no exception (see here and here). Prop. 65 requires businesses to provide “a clear and reasonable warning before they cause an exposure to a chemical listed as known to