A reporter called me the other day on the Apple-Proview trademark kerfuffle. She kept wanting me to give her a quote on what foreign companies should take away from this dispute and I kept parrying with her, unable to give her just one. I kept finding myself saying “it’s more complicated than that.”
Let me back up a bit. Apple is in a massive trademark fight with a Shenzhen-based company called Proview. Near as I can tell, the facts are as follows:
- Proview-Shenzhen registered the iPad trade-name before Apple had ever manufactured an iPad.
- Proview-Taiwan (a Taiwanese company that is not the same company as Proview-Shenzhen) entered into an agreement with Apple (or, more accurately, a company acting on Apple’s behalf) to sell its Asian iPad trademarks to Apple.
- Apple claims its agreement with Proview-Taiwan included the PRC iPad trademark, but Proview is claiming otherwise.
- Apple sued Proview (I think Proview-Taiwan, but I am not sure) in Hong Kong and the Hong Kong court ruled that Apple is entitled to use the iPad trademark in Mainland China.
Here is where it gets so complicated and here is how I see it:
- Proview-Shenzhen still shows up as the owner of the iPad trademark in China.
- It is not clear if Proview-Shenzhen ever contracted with Apple to give Apple the China iPad trademark or any sort of license to use that trademark.
- It appears Proview-Taiwan entered into a trademark sale or licensing agreement with Apple (again, actually the company acting on Apple’s behalf), but since Proview-Taiwan did not own the PRC trademark for iPad, there are real issues as to the validity of such a sale or license.
- Did Proview-Taiwan have any interest in the PRC iPad trademark such that it could transfer or sell that interest to Apple?
- Did Proview-Shenzhen ever agree to sell or license its iPad trademark to Apple?
What I find difficult to believe is that Apple and/or Apple’s attorneys would have done a deal to acquire rights to the iPad trademark in China without first having done their due diligence on that trademark. Basic due diligence would have revealed the PRC iPad trademark was registered to Proview-Shenzhen, and at that point, Apple would have required Proview-Shenzhen (not Proview-Taiwan) to sign the contract to assign or license the PRC mark. So the first thing to be learned from this (maybe) is to do your due diligence and make sure when you are buying something or securing a license to something that you are in fact doing so with the company actually authorized to sell or license that item.
This all came to the fore when Proview-Shenzhen started asking trademark officials in various Chinese cities to start pulling iPads from store shelves for infringing on Proview-Shenzhen’s trademark. Some cities are pulling iPads from store shelves.
Now Proview-Shenzhen is saying it will ask China customs to block exports of Apple’s iPads from China because they infringe on Proview-Shenzhen’s trademark. The media seem to believe this will not happen because it would look so bad for China politically. This is where the real lesson lies. If you are not Apple, I can pretty much assure you that all of your iPads would be off the shelves in China by now and they would also not be leaving China via export.
The real lesson then is what most companies must do to prevent this from happening to “their” trademark and that lesson is quite simple. If you want to avoid your product getting pulled off shelves in China and/or prevented from leaving China, make sure the branding and trademarks you put on your product (or on its packaging) are registered (or licensed) to you as trademarks in China. And just to be clear, “in China,” does not mean in Hong Kong or in Taiwan or in Macau or in the United States or in Australia or in any other country. If you want China trademark protection, you must register the trademark in China.
Just don’t say we didn’t warn you.