Harris Sliwoski 乔纳森·本奇(Jonathan Bench)和弗雷德·罗卡福特(Fred Rocafort)再次坐下来,探讨了非同质化代币(NFT)及其发行和转让过程中常见的法律问题。
需要Web 3.0法律方面的帮助吗?
在处理 NFT 时,请注意相关合约,无论是智能合约还是传统合约。请注意,管辖权差异可能至关重要,且这是所有 Web3 技术及未来争议解决机制中固有的问题。
不要被智能合约中的“智能”二字所迷惑。你应该将智能合约视为一份更大、更全面的传统合同中的一部分。智能合约固然可以发挥作用,但它既不应也不可能完全取代传统合同的最佳实践。
尽可能对所有内容进行登记。确定您已创造或获得的知识产权,并明确保护这些知识产权所需采取的步骤。
请确保商标注册涵盖 NFT 的使用。NFT 的使用属于与您传统业务完全不同的商标类别,您需要据此采取相应的保护措施。
商标转让协议应包含关于NFT的条款。NFT通常涉及对现有商标的一种新型使用方式。
请注意“裸许可”的问题,以免在转让或授权NFT时,无意中转让或放弃了您所有的知识产权。
乔纳森·本奇 0:05
弗雷德,感谢你今天再次加入我们,进行本次讨论的第三部分。让我们来谈谈在NFT领域工作时的一些基本法律注意事项。你对大家有什么建议吗?
Fred Rocafort 0:15
Well, sure, first and foremost, look at the specific terms, whether you’re talking about a smart contract, whether you’re talking about a conventional contract, whether you’re having to follow particular terms and conditions that are set up by the entity, selling the NFT, or by the platform on which it’s being shared, look at the look at the fine prints, right, this is this is, in a way no different than the advice we would give for for people engaging in all kinds of transactions, that the terms will be different. There is no such thing as NFT law, you know, that is going to create special rules, at least not for the time being at a presentation that I attend that recently, somebody offered a great example, using using the hammers as an example and saying, look, there’s no national hammer law in any country. But if you go and then bash someone’s head with with that, with that hammer, then there’s going to be criminal criminal law implications. And it’s the same thing with with with with with an NFT. Right. What are you doing with it? Right? I mean, there’s all sorts of potential implications, you know, one, one area in particular that you might be looking at, right, for example, is there is there a potential for NFT’s to be used as a vehicle in the issuance of securities, right? I mean, I haven’t seen that. But it but to the extent that it potentially could be used in that way, then securities laws are going to be implicated, right? You have to look at the use. And in the same way that that regulation is going to depend on the particular users that are being given to the NFT, the conditions under which you acquire it aren’t going to change the rights that you have, it could be the case that I sell an NFT that includes artwork that I created. And as part of that package, I am also transferring my copyright over that, but somebody else might be doing the exact same thing but retaining that so really look at the really look at the specifics. And don’t let the smart part of smart contracts dazzle you. It the definition, there’s still debate over what exactly is is this a smart contract, but I can tell you, it doesn’t mean that it’s going to smartly and wisely get rid of all issues that are faced by parties when they enter into a contract. So take a look at that. And again, don’t neglect the terms and conditions, don’t neglect that I mean that because that could really devil is in the details. And it could be those conditions that are even less likely to, to or that you might just a higher chance that you might not read them that that that might be the key to what you can do and not do. More broadly. For for anyone who’s involved in this space, especially from from the creative side of things, register everything that you can in terms of IP. If you are if you if you have a business, the your your your create your minting NFTs even putting aside what intellectual property rights you might have over what you’re creating, at least protect your business, right you have a name, you might have a logo, you might have slogans that you use, protect those, right? If you are someone who is minting NFT’s using their own artwork, or if you’re representing or working together with that original creator, again, protect that that underlying work so that there’s no ambiguity there so that you don’t accidentally end up giving up rights that that could be of value. So in in essence, a lot of the the legal advice connected to NFT’s is advice that that is a very wide application. These are these are legal fundamentals really. One important thing is make sure that in the case, specifically of trademarks, make sure that your trademark applications are or if you have, if you have registered your trademark already, make sure that you expand that coverage to include activities in this space. There’s a, there’s been a flurry of activity by all sorts of companies that are getting into this space, making sure that their trademarks are covering their activities and in the web three space. And that is something that all companies entering the world through space should be doing. Because just to give a very simple example, let’s say that I’m in the business of making T shirts. And that’s what I’ve been doing for a long time. But now I want to start minting NFT’s and maybe connecting those to my to my to my actual clothing, or it might be going into completely new business areas, right maybe selling virtual T shirts, whatever the case may be. Now, if my trademark registrations only extend to, to my core business of selling clothing, then I might not have sufficient protections for for my for my NFT business. So so be sure to update and refresh those. Those registrations. I mean, I think this is a very, very, this is a very actionable intelligence that that we can provide. Also, when entering into licensing agreements, whether that is as part of the of the smart contract, or whether you are providing this content and creating Terms and Conditions. Be careful with licensing and again, this is this is not a an NFT specific issue, it’s just that in the NFT context, it’s going to manifest itself in different ways. Make sure that you avoid the pitfalls that are present. When for for license ORs. So just a very brief summary when you license the use of your of your trademark, if you’re not careful, if you basically, you know, for example, if I had a trademark and I say, Jonathan, I hereby grant you a license to do whatever you want with my trademark, that creates the risk that that trademark will be considered to be Jonathan’s and not mine. Right? That’s I’m oversimplifying. But but there that risk does exist and a licensing agreement that’s well drafted will have provisions addressing that, and there will be safeguards in place to to avoid that outcome, right? Because that’s usually not what what a what a license or wants, right? If I wanted to give away the trademark, I could do that. License usually implies that I want to retain ownership in that and data in that trademark. So in the NFT context, and again, it’s an evolving area. So there are going to be challenges, there are going to be some bumps in the road. But at a minimum, we can say, watch out for those issues, right? It’s going to be a challenge for us as attorneys to come up with the contractual provisions that allow our clients who are licensed in their their trademarks in the NFT context do to retain that ownership. But it is something that we have to be will have to look look out for and our audience should as well.
乔纳森·本奇 8:21
弗雷德,我觉得有必要指出,有时人们会问我们:这到底有什么关系?对吧?我也想说,这个问题我们稍后再谈。 这一切为什么重要?我想,除非你某天想维护自己的权益,否则这确实无关紧要,对吧?法律、良好的商业合同、良好的商业关系,在事情出问题之前,人们往往不会去依赖这些合同。而到了那时,你才需要回过头来问自己:我到底有哪些权利?所以,权利本身并不重要。 各位,这种情况在大麻行业发生过,在每个新兴行业都会发生:那些身处前沿、赚得盆满钵满、随心所欲的人,对他们来说从来都不是问题,直到某个政府机构或其他人采取执法行动,或者有人站出来说:“我受到了不公对待,我的权利在哪里?” 因此,我认为有必要重申这一点:我们并非为了阻止交易发生而存在。我们存在的意义,是确保你们以为达成的协议,确实就是你们正在达成的协议。
Fred Rocafort 9:21
没错,完全正确。而且你要确保自己签订的协议确实符合你的预期。正因如此,你知道的,在这次对话中,我特意强调了两次,对吧?要小心,即使有人告诉你,购买NFT就能让你拥有那本书或那张图片的所有权。 也别对此掉以轻心。对吧,因为情况可能如此,但也可能并非如此。所以,就像你说的,我喜欢你的表述方式——务必确保你所达成的交易确实如你所想。






