Dado que la Administración de Alimentos y Medicamentos (FDA) afirma que los alimentos y suplementos dietéticos con infusión de CBD no pueden venderse ni comercializarse legalmente en Estados Unidos, nos encontramos con un mosaico de leyes estatales a menudo incoherentes. Una de las áreas donde puede haber mayores diferencias es en las etiquetas de los productos con CBD. Cumplir con los requisitos de etiquetado del CBD
Para bien o para mal, la Ley de Agua Potable Segura y Aplicación de Tóxicos de 1986 (también conocida como Prop. 65) lleva mucho tiempo afectando a las empresas de California. Y las empresas de cannabis no son una excepción (ver aquí y aquí). La Prop. 65 exige a las empresas que proporcionen "una advertencia clara y razonable antes de que causen una exposición a una sustancia química que figure en la lista de sustancias que se sabe que son nocivas para la salud".
We’ve written time and again about the looming terror of Prop. 65 violations for cannabis businesses when it comes to packaging and labeling their products with the correct safe harbor language. The Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (a/k/a Prop. 65), requires the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) to publish a
Our California cannabis attorneys have been getting inundated with packaging and labeling review since each California cannabis licensing agency adopted its final rules in January 2019, and even before that when the rules were under consideration. One thing that many California cannabis companies—and especially cannabis companies from other states who are stakeholders in California—often overlook
California is just starting to get its cannabis packaging and labeling regulations right under MAUCRSA. California has a mandated transition period from January 1 to July 1, 2018, during which time adult use and medical marijuana licensees can do business with each other and temporary and annual state licensees can transport and sell cannabis products already
Products liability and its application to marijuana businesses is a topic we’ve discussed at great length. In California, however, marijuana business owners have additional cause for concern: Proposition 65. California’s Proposition 65, or the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, requires the State to publish a list of chemicals known to cause
