Webinar flyer titled “280E After Cannabis Rescheduling: Claiming the Deductions and Preserving the Refunds” featuring four speakers and event details for October 23, 2026.

Upcoming Webinar: Cannabis Rescheduling and Section 280E

Join Harris Sliwoski Managing Partner Vince Sliwoski on October 23, 2026, for 280E After Cannabis Rescheduling: Claiming the Deductions and Preserving the Refunds. This is a Federal Bar Association CLE webinar examining how recent federal cannabis rescheduling developments affect business deductions, tax liabilities, and potential refund claims. Vince will be joined by Ani Galyan of

Webinar banner: “DEA Enforcement in a Changing Cannabis Landscape” with photos of four speakers, event date October 8, 2026, and times listed for multiple time zones.

Webinar Recording: DEA Enforcement, Cannabis Rescheduling, and Hemp Regulation

If you missed our October 8 webinar, DEA Enforcement in a Changing Cannabis Landscape: Rescheduling, Hemp, and What Comes Next, the recording is now available to watch. Harris Sliwoski LLP Partner Jason Adelstone was joined by Matthew John Strait, former Deputy Assistant Administrator in the DEA’s Diversion Control Division; Mark Caplin, Founder and CEO of

Webinar banner: “DEA Enforcement in a Changing Cannabis Landscape” with photos of four speakers, event date October 8, 2026, and times listed for multiple time zones.

FREE Webinar Today: DEA Enforcement in a Changing Cannabis Landscape

There’s still time to register for today’s webinar, DEA Enforcement in a Changing Cannabis Landscape: Rescheduling, Hemp, and What Comes Next. Today, Harris Sliwoski LLP Partner Jason Adelstone will be joined by Matthew John Strait, former Deputy Assistant Administrator in the DEA’s Diversion Control Division; Mark Caplin, Founder and CEO of CannaGen; and Dr. Gillian

midterm elections cannabis

Cannabis and the Midterm Elections

The midterms are less than a month away, with elections mostly scheduled for November 3, 2026. Cannabis reform is on the table both directly and indirectly, at the federal, state and local levels. The vast majority of Americans support legalizing marijuana in some way, which has been the case for years now. Whether that general

executive action marijuana rescheduling

Executive Action and Marijuana Legalization: What a President Can Do Without Congress

Recently on the podcast High Spirits: The Cannabis Business Podcast, I discussed how cannabis legalization can occur through executive action, not just congressional action. This post will expand on what we discussed on the podcast. My co-founder, Amna Shamim, and I started Project Four 2029 to engage with presidential and congressional candidates ahead of the

dea rescheduling delayed

"Marijuana" Rescheduling Delayed, Again. What It Could Mean, and What Comes Next

What just happened in the marijuana rescheduling hearing On September 28, 2026, three participants in the ALJ marijuana rescheduling hearing filed a “Joint Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Briefing, for Admission of Supplemental Exhibit, and for Stay of Proceedings.” The motion was submitted by DUID Victim Voices, Kenneth Finn, M.D., and the National Drug

Webinar banner: “DEA Enforcement in a Changing Cannabis Landscape” with photos of four speakers, event date October 8, 2026, and times listed for multiple time zones.

DEA Enforcement in a Changing Cannabis Landscape: Rescheduling, Hemp, and What Comes Next

Join us on October 8, 2026, for DEA Enforcement in a Changing Cannabis Landscape: Rescheduling, Hemp, and What Comes Next, a free webinar examining what the evolving federal cannabis landscape could mean for cannabis and hemp businesses. The discussion will feature: Jason Adelstone, Partner at Harris Sliwoski LLP; Matthew John Strait, former Deputy Assistant Administrator

Legal document with a green cannabis leaf, “$31.8M VERDICT” text, “UNENFORCEABLE” stamped in red, and a judge’s gavel to the right.

A $31.8 Million Cannabis-Related Verdict That a Federal Court Wouldn’t Enforce

A Michigan cannabis grower proved breach of contract and won a $31.8 million jury verdict—only to lose it on appeal. The Sixth Circuit held that a federal court could not enforce an agreement requiring conduct prohibited by the Controlled Substances Act. The decision offers a stark warning about forum selection, federal illegality, medical-use limitations, and remedies in cannabis contracts.

Subscribe To Our Blog

Explore the latest legal news and insight regarding China, cannabis, international law, immigration, dispute resolution and Web3.