الدعاوى القضائية البارزة الرامية إلى إنهاء حظر القنب ليست بالأمر الجديد. فقد تناولنا جهودًا تعود إلى عدة سنوات مضت، رغم أن أيا منها لم يكلل بالنجاح. غير أن المحاولة التي أُعلن عنها مؤخرًا قد تكون أفضل فرصة حتى الآن – لا سيما في ضوء التغيرات التي تشهدها البيئة المحيطة مع تقنين القنب في العديد من الولايات؛ وبالأخص في ضوء الفقه الدستوري ذي الصلة بتلك التغيرات.
نظراً للنمو الذي تشهده صناعة القنب والتجارة الدولية على حد سواء، أصبح من المهم أكثر من أي وقت مضى فهم أساسيات شراء السلع المتعلقة بالقنب من الخارج والتحديات التي تنطوي عليها هذه العملية. وقد تعلمت شركة «روت ساينسز» (Root Sciences)، وهي شركة متخصصة في استخلاص القنب، هذا الدرس بالطريقة الصعبة. فقد رفعت الشركة الأسبوع الماضي دعوى استئناف أمام محكمة الدائرة الفيدرالية عقب الدعوى القضائية التي رفعتها
Civil litigation in cannabis, like any other industry, usually proceeds in a predicable order. First, a complaint is filed and served. This kicks off the lawsuit and compels a defendant to file an Answer to avoid a default judgment. Second, the parties conduct written discovery: i.e. gathering relevant documents, identifying potential witnesses, and serving interrogatories and
As a cannabis intellectual property litigator, part of my job is to help clients make cost-benefit and risk analyses. My colleagues and I have written several posts about the defense of “parody” in cannabis intellectual property litigation, and why it’s a very specific defense that people tend to overstretch in most cases. While that remains
Like all commercial litigation, cannabis business litigation is expensive and in most circumstances a party cannot recover its attorneys’ fees. The exception is where recovery is authorized by a contract or a statute. This post discusses how a party in commercial litigation—whether involving cannabis or not—can use an Offer of Judgment to leverage a more
Most people who are (luckily) not familiar with litigation believe alternative dispute resolution (or “ADR”) clauses in their contracts are essentially boilerplate language that’s recycled again and again in every contract. However, well-drafted ADR clauses can not only give you a huge advantage if an issue comes up, they may also cause your counterparty to
The intersection of state and federal law on cannabis has led to some interesting situations at the border, especially where cannabis related property is seized. States such as Washington, Oregon, and California have legalized cannabis for all uses, while the federal Controlled Substances Act still prohibits marijuana distribution and sale anywhere in the United States.
The days where the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) pays no mind to cannabis businesses (marijuana and hemp) are long gone. These days, the FTC is treating consumer complaints regarding hemp and marijuana businesses similar to complaints against businesses in other industries. The self-proclaimed mission of the FTC is to: “prevent anticompetitive, deceptive, and unfair business
Like companies in any other industry, licensed cannabis companies typically carry insurance and sometimes find themselves at odds with their cannabis business insurers. Those companies purchase a policy to cover a specific risk for a stated premium and when that risk presents itself, their business insurers suddenly have fine-print explanations for everything. In these situations,
When issues arise, many people think filing a lawsuit is the answer. That will initiate the litigation process, which will most likely involve an exchange of information and documents, the process of taking depositions, and probably some motion practice along the way. While in some cases it certainly is, we typically counsel new clients (and
